Company details

HEADCOUNT

25-99

ORG TYPE

Startup

SECTOR

Technology & Digital

WEBSITE

https://www.voize.de

About the company

voize builds an AI voice companion for nurses and care staff, aimed at reducing documentation time so more of a shift goes back to care. The company positions the product as speech recognition plus structured clinical documentation workflows for care facilities and hospitals. voize publicly ties growth to large-scale rollout across care facilities and high user adoption among nurses. voize has raised institutional funding across Seed and Series A rounds and presents itself as a fast-scaling healthtech startup.

Locations and presence

The company is centered on Berlin, with an additional Munich office listed in portfolio hiring materials. Roles are frequently advertised as hybrid or remote within Germany, alongside expansion signals toward the US market in hiring and fundraising narratives.

Palpable Score

60.6

/ 100

voize offers a few real entry points through internships and working-student roles, but the most visible “core” tech hiring leans mid-level. Hiring looks relatively structured and respectful based on candidate feedback, and voize is stronger than many startups on benefits and pay signals, but public proof of early-career progression and retention is still thin.

Pillar 1: Early-career access

Score

9.8

/ 20

The company has early-career doors via a Revenue Operations Internship and multiple Working Student roles that show up across job aggregators.
voize also lists several “core” roles with experience bars like 3+ years for backend engineering, which narrows graduate access in the most in-demand team.
The company does not show a consistent stream of Junior or Associate titles across functions at the same time, so entry-level access looks opportunistic rather than recurring.

Pillar 2: Hiring fairness and transparency

Score

14.8

/ 20

The company runs hiring through a formal ATS setup (Ashby appears across role postings and aggregators), which supports consistent application handling.
voize has candidate interview feedback describing a staged, time-bounded process with multiple rounds and an assignment, rather than a single vague chat.
The company still leaves key fairness details out of many public role pages, like the exact interview steps, timelines, and what a “good” take-home looks like.

Pillar 3: Learning and support

Score

11.8

/ 20

The company advertises concrete learning inputs as benefits, including access to learning platforms and language courses, which helps early-career hires build skills while working.
voize also hires roles focused on enablement and learning systems (for example a Learning Experience Program Owner), which suggests the company invests in structured learning at least for some audiences.
The company rarely spells out early-career support mechanisms inside role ads, like a ramp plan, pairing, mentorship ownership, or feedback cadence.

Pillar 4: Pay fairness and stability

Score

14.7

/ 20

The company publishes a clear salary band for at least some engineering roles on external job boards (for example €70k–€85k for backend engineering roles on YC listings).
voize lists stability-oriented perks for Germany-based hires such as 30 vacation days plus a birthday day off, Urban Sports Club, and stock options.
The company does not consistently publish salary ranges across the broader role set, which caps pay fairness confidence for entry-level candidates comparing offers.

Pillar 5: Early-career outcomes

Score

9.5

/ 20

The company has external momentum signals through a Seed round and a later Series A raise, which supports runway and the likelihood of teams staying intact long enough for juniors to grow.
voize has public “at-scale” adoption claims (care facilities and nurse usage), which increases the chance that early hires work on real production problems rather than demos.
The company does not publish early-career outcome evidence like intern-to-offer conversion, promotion timelines, or 12–24 month retention, and public review volume is too small to fill that gap reliably.