Secondmind

Automotive system optimisation software
Last updated:
February 2, 2026
Company details
HQ
HEADCOUNT
25-99
ORG TYPE
Startup
SECTOR
Manufacturing & Industrials
About the company
Secondmind is an engineering AI company focused on system design and performance optimisation, with a strong footprint in automotive engineering workflows. The company’s public positioning centres on reducing simulation and testing requirements while keeping engineering quality high, so teams can move faster on complex vehicle programmes. Secondmind was founded in 2016, with co-founder credit publicly given to Aleksi Tukiainen and Dongho Kim (and also Vishal Chatrath in several profiles). The company is headquartered in Cambridge and has also talked publicly about expanding commercial presence in the US automotive market.
Locations and presence
Secondmind is Cambridge-headquartered with a hybrid setup anchored around the Cambridge HQ. The company has also signalled North America expansion through senior commercial hiring tied to the US automotive market.
Palpable Score
51.4
/ 100
Secondmind offers real early-career opportunities mainly for research-track candidates (especially PhD-level), but the company is not visibly a broad “first job” hirer across many functions at once. The biggest limits for graduates are inconsistent public evidence on hiring consistency, pay transparency, and early-career progression outcomes.
Pillar 1: Early-career access

Score

9.3
/ 20
  • The company has advertised research roles that explicitly welcome “fresh PhD graduates,” which is a clear entry point for doctorate-level early-career candidates.
  • Secondmind has previously run a structured internship programme aimed at PhD researchers (publicly posted as an internship intake with multiple positions).
  • The company’s own careers page leans on a “speculative interest” route rather than a steady stream of junior, associate, or graduate-labelled roles across teams.

Pillar 2: Hiring fairness and transparency

Score

9.8
/ 20
  • The company has candidate-reported interview experiences describing clarity on stages and expectations in at least one process, suggesting some teams run a tidy loop.
  • Secondmind also has candidate reports describing an impersonal, high-level interview style and a disappointing experience, pointing to inconsistency by role or interviewer.
  • The company does not publish a standard interview map with timelines on the careers site, which leaves early-career applicants guessing about time burden.

Pillar 3: Learning and support

Score

12.5
/ 20
  • The company runs a virtual research seminar series with external guest speakers and occasional talks by Secondmind researchers, which is a concrete, repeatable learning channel.
  • Secondmind publicly emphasises collaboration and learning from applied machine learning specialists, and the research site shows an active cadence of knowledge-sharing content.
  • The company does not publicly spell out onboarding mechanics (buddying, ramp plans, review cadence), so support for juniors is more “culture-led” than policy-led in public materials.

Pillar 4: Pay fairness and stability

Score

9.8
/ 20
  • The company has employee-reported compensation and benefits sentiment visible on third-party platforms, which gives a partial benchmark signal.
  • Secondmind does not consistently publish salary ranges on roles, which makes offer benchmarking harder for early-career candidates who benefit from upfront clarity.
  • The company’s public careers materials focus on flexibility and culture rather than specifics like pay bands, equity ranges, or level-based progression pay.

Pillar 5: Early-career outcomes

Score

10.0
/ 20
  • The company has third-party review aggregates indicating a majority of reviewers would recommend the company, which is a supportive but non-specific outcome signal.
  • Secondmind has public signals of commercial momentum (funding announcements, leadership hires, and market expansion updates), but those do not translate into published early-career retention or promotion outcomes.
  • The company does not publish early-career outcome metrics such as internship-to-full-time conversion, 12–24 month retention, or typical time-to-promotion, so progression outcomes remain hard to validate.

Clear filters
Results
matched jobs
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
👀🔜 No results found — but we’re listening.
Send us a message about what you're looking for at john@bepalpable.com