• The company runs explicit graduate-entry pathways, including “2026 New Graduate Roles” and multiple Engineer I postings that target early-career applicants.
• Relativity Space advertises entry-level roles where professional experience is not required (for example Propulsion Design Engineer I, Combustion Devices) alongside other “Engineer I” openings.
• The company’s overall role mix still leans mid-to-senior across many teams, so early-career access is meaningful but not the majority of hiring.

‍

• The company publishes a clear anti-scam warning on the official jobs page and tells candidates how to verify listings and report suspicious outreach.
• Relativity Space job descriptions are unusually specific about constraints that matter to candidates, including export compliance/ITAR eligibility, equal opportunity language, and accommodation contact details.
• The company has public candidate reports of long, presentation-heavy interview loops and technical testing, which can feel like a high burden for early-career applicants.

‍

• The company includes a recurring annual learning and development stipend as part of the benefits language surfaced in job postings and benefits pages.
• Relativity Space has internship feedback that points to high-learning environments and accessible teammates, which is a practical early-career support signal.
• The company does not consistently publish role-level coaching mechanics like buddy systems, time-boxed ramp plans, or formal mentorship structures, limiting confidence in day-to-day support consistency.

‍

• The company posts “Hiring Range” compensation bands on many roles, including Engineer I and senior engineering roles, which reduces negotiation opacity.
• Relativity Space lists a total rewards package that commonly includes equity, PTO and sick leave language, parental leave, and an L&D stipend across postings.
• The company has public intern feedback that pay and housing assistance are not competitive, which matters in a high-cost location like Long Beach and pulls this pillar down.

‍

• The company has public employee feedback that references layoffs and job-security anxiety, which is a direct risk to early-career retention.
• Relativity Space has mixed progression signals in public Q&A, including claims that promotion paths are limited or unclear in some teams.
• The company has limited published early-career outcomes data such as junior promotion rates, time-to-promotion ranges, or 12–24 month retention figures, which caps the score even where teams are strong.

‍