• The company currently shows only a small number of live openings on the official careers page, which limits realistic 0–3 year entry points.
• Reactive Technologies has advertised a Marketing Assistant role explicitly aimed at a “recent graduate,” which is a genuine early-career doorway outside engineering.
• The company does not present a recurring graduate scheme, internship programme, or apprenticeship intake on the main careers site, so entry-level hiring reads occasional rather than planned.

‍

• The company’s job posts are structured with clear sections for responsibilities, experience expectations, and benefits, which helps first-time applicants understand role scope.
• Reactive Technologies runs applications through a simple CV-upload flow, but the company does not set expectations on stages, timelines, assessments, or feedback norms.
• The company includes equal-opportunity language in job adverts, which is a positive baseline, but transparency would be stronger with a published hiring process guide.

‍

• The company includes “career progression opportunities” in the careers pitch, signalling that learning is meant to be part of the employee experience.
• Reactive Technologies lists practical support signals in a senior role advert, including training budgets to support personal growth, which can also benefit juniors if access is equitable.
• The company does not publicly describe onboarding, mentoring, pairing, 1:1 cadence, or a ramp plan for new graduates, which makes day-to-day support hard to verify.

‍

• The company often labels compensation as “competitive” and leaves salary blank in postings like Marketing Assistant, which limits pay transparency for early-career candidates.
• Reactive Technologies does spell out a tangible benefits set in job adverts, including pension, private medical cover, life insurance, and flexible working, which supports baseline stability.
• The company includes additional reward components in some postings, such as performance-related bonus and home-working allowance, but without ranges early-career pay fairness can’t be scored strongly.

‍

• The company has limited public review volume, so early-career outcomes are hard to validate with confidence.
• Reactive Technologies shows mixed sentiment on a major review platform, with strong overall ratings but low “recommend to a friend” percentage, which is a caution flag for consistency.
• The company does not publish cohort outcomes such as intern-to-offer conversion, graduate progression timelines, or 12–24 month retention, so outcomes remain mostly unproven.

‍