• The company has recruited investment team interns in Berlin for a January 2026 start with a minimum 3-month duration, which is a genuine early-career entry point into the core investing function.
• Cherry Ventures primarily advertises experienced roles on the firm’s own job board, and even “Analyst” investment roles are framed around prior experience rather than first-job entry.
• The company’s public hiring footprint also channels many candidates toward portfolio-company roles via the Cherry talent board, which is useful for graduates but does not increase direct entry-level volume into Cherry Ventures itself.

‍

• The company has candidate-reported hiring steps that include CV screening, a TestGorilla assessment, and a case study, which signals a repeatable structure rather than a single informal chat.
• Cherry Ventures has public interview reports that describe candidates not hearing back after interviews or after submitting a case study, which is a direct negative signal on follow-through and candidate respect.
• The company includes equal-opportunity language and GDPR data-handling statements in the Greenhouse application flow, but Cherry Ventures does not publish a clear candidate-facing hiring timeline or feedback standard, so expectations stay uncertain.

‍

• The company scopes the investment internship around real work, including researching companies, supporting diligence, drafting investment memos, and contributing to internal investment discussions.
• Cherry Ventures has intern review feedback describing a steep learning curve and flexibility in tasks, which fits a small-team environment where juniors can pick up a wide range quickly.
• The company does not publish a consistent onboarding, mentorship, or training model for interns or junior hires, so learning support likely depends heavily on who the intern works with.

‍

• The company’s own job adverts commonly use “competitive compensation and benefits” language without salary ranges, which limits pay transparency for early-career candidates trying to benchmark offers.
• Cherry Ventures runs hiring through Greenhouse with standardised application terms and compliance language, but the public job adverts for Cherry Ventures roles do not spell out benefits in a consistent, candidate-comparable way.
• The company’s small size limits publicly available compensation signals, and there is not enough reliable public data to judge whether early-career pay is market-aligned across roles.

‍

• The company has a small set of employee and intern reviews that are positive on learning and team environment, suggesting some early-career hires leave with stronger skills and a stronger network.
• Cherry Ventures explicitly hires for “high-performance” environments and “high expectations for quality, ownership, and speed” in internal roles, which can accelerate growth but can also make early-career sustainability more role-dependent.
• The company does not publish early-career outcomes like internship-to-offer conversion rates, time-to-promotion, or retention by cohort, and the limited volume of public reviews makes outcomes hard to validate at scale.

‍