• The company has a live R&D Technician role that asks for at least 1 year of research experience and a bachelor’s degree, which is within reach for some recent grads.
• Queens Carbon mainly hires into hands-on lab and pilot-manufacturing roles, but the other visible openings skew more experienced, including a Senior R&D Scientist requiring a PhD or 10+ years.
• The company does not show a recurring internship, apprentice, or “0–2 years” intake pattern on the careers hub, so early-career access looks occasional.

‍

• The company uses a standard ATS-style application flow (Breezy) with clear role pages, which is better than informal email-only hiring for consistency.
• Queens Carbon writes unusually practical job details for technicians, including physical requirements, in-person expectations, and what work looks like day to day.
• The company does not publish interview stages, timelines, or assessment expectations, and there’s little independent candidate feedback available to validate consistency.

‍

• The company describes technicians as working directly with Scientists and Engineers and reporting results and observations, which is a strong “learn next to the people building the tech” signal.
• Queens Carbon includes “brainstorm improvements to our technology” language in the lab technician scope, which suggests juniors can contribute beyond repetitive bench work.
• The company does not share concrete early-career support mechanics like onboarding plans, buddy systems, 1:1 cadence, or review cycles in public job descriptions.

‍

• The company posts salary ranges for at least two roles, including $70k–$95k for an R&D Technician and $120k–$150k for a Senior R&D Scientist, which is strong transparency for a small startup.
• Queens Carbon states equity plus insurance options (health, dental, vision, life) and 401(k) in technician postings, which improves stability for early-career hires.
• The company does not consistently publish salary ranges for every role (for example the Process Technician lists “competitive salary” without a range), which stops this pillar from scoring higher.

‍

• The company does not publish early-career outcome evidence such as promotion timelines, retention over 12–24 months, or intern-to-offer conversion rates.
• Queens Carbon shares team and growth milestones, but those updates don’t show how junior hires progress in scope or title over time.
• The company has limited independent employee-review coverage, so it’s hard to validate manager quality and progression patterns from outside sources.

‍